Who Monitors the Integrity of the Vote

At every polling station – observers from parties, NGOs, media, and international missions (OSCE/ODIHR, SCO, CIS). Observers from more than 30 countries have been invited. Each observer receives a copy of the count protocol. Discrepancies are grounds for verification and a court challenge.

Referendum 1 min read 📄
0:00

Who stands behind transparency

Trust in the result is the key question of any vote. Here is who monitors the process:

  • Parties – each registered party sends an observer to every polling station
  • NGOs – accredited civil society organisations
  • Media – journalists with accreditation
  • International missions – OSCE/ODIHR, SCO, CIS, the Turkic Council
  • Foreign observers – from more than 30 countries

What observers see

The entire process – from the opening of the station to the counting of the last ballot:

  • Opening of ballot boxes – are they empty?
  • The voting process – is secrecy of the ballot maintained?
  • Counting of ballots – in full view of observers
  • Drawing up the protocol – the key document

The protocol – the main guarantee

The count protocol:

  • Is signed by all members of the precinct commission
  • A copy is given to each observer – this is a legally binding document
  • Data are transmitted to the higher commission
  • If the final figures diverge from the precinct protocol – that is grounds for verification

What to do if there is a violation

  • The observer files a complaint with the precinct commission on the spot
  • The complaint is recorded in an act
  • The result can be challenged in court
  • International missions publish a report with their assessment – this affects Kazakhstan's international reputation

Key facts

  • Observers: parties, NGOs, media, international missions from 30+ countries
  • OSCE/ODIHR has been invited to observe
  • Each observer receives a copy of the count protocol
  • Violations are recorded on the spot; results can be challenged in court