Myths

Myth: “Boycott is the strongest political response”

A boycott is not always the strongest strategy. According to the CEC, turnout reached 70.98% – the 50% threshold was exceeded. 87.15% voted in favor. The Constitution was adopted.

Why boycott can seem attractive

For some citizens, boycott expresses a refusal to recognize or legitimize the process. This may feel like a morally or politically strong stance, especially where trust is low.

The practical weakness of boycott

In a referendum, boycott usually does not translate into a direct substantive position. It does not clearly show:

Why participation has more direct effect

Participation allows a citizen to:

Boycott, by contrast, often affects the process only indirectly.

When boycott could have mattered

Boycott would only have been mechanically effective if turnout had fallen below 50% – in that case the referendum would have been declared invalid. According to the CEC, as of 18:00, turnout is 70.98% (8,845,280 citizens received ballots) – the 50% threshold has been exceeded.

Main idea

Boycott may be a political gesture, but voting is the clearest way to affect the formal result of a referendum.

Key facts