Myths

Myth: “Boycott is the strongest political response”

A boycott is not the same as a “No” vote. The official record counts turnout and votes cast, not a separate boycott category. Final turnout on March 15, 2026 was 73.12%, and 87.15% of participants voted in favor. A “No” vote affected the result; non-participation was not counted as a protest vote.

Why boycott can seem attractive

For some citizens, boycott expresses a refusal to recognize or legitimize the process. This may feel like a morally or politically strong stance, especially where trust is low.

The practical weakness of boycott

In a referendum, boycott usually does not translate into a direct substantive position. It does not clearly show:

Why participation has more direct effect

Participation allows a citizen to:

Boycott, by contrast, often affects the process only indirectly.

When boycott could have mattered

A boycott could have affected the legal validity of the vote only if final turnout had fallen below 50%. Actual turnout on March 15, 2026 was 73.12%, so the threshold was met.

Main idea

Boycott may be a political gesture, but voting is the clearest way to affect the formal result of a referendum.

Key facts